Peer Observation and Evaluation Tool (POET): A Formative Peer Review Supporting Scholarly Teaching
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Formative and peer-to-peer evaluation using a rubric tool
The current essay starts from the general set of issues related to assessment in education and the problems that students face in understanding assessment criteria. It will later introduce the results obtained from a work-inprogressresearch project that aims to improve assessment quality by testing new evaluation methods and technological tools such as formative evaluation and peer-to peer eval...
متن کاملDevelopment of a peer teaching-assessment program and a peer observation and evaluation tool.
OBJECTIVES To develop a formalized, comprehensive, peer-driven teaching assessment program and a valid and reliable assessment tool. METHODS A volunteer taskforce was formed and a peer-assessment program was developed using a multistep, sequential approach and the Peer Observation and Evaluation Tool (POET). A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency and practicality of the proces...
متن کاملPeer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool
BACKGROUND Peer observation of Teaching involves observers providing descriptive feedback to their peers on learning and teaching practice as a means to improve quality of teaching. This study employed and assessed peer observation as a constructive, developmental process for members of a Pediatric Teaching Faculty. METHODS This study describes how peer observation was implemented as part of ...
متن کاملPeer observation as a transformatory tool ?
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opin...
متن کاملGender bias in scholarly peer review
Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing and it is essential that peer reviewers are appointed on the basis of their expertise alone. However, it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewers generally remains confidential. Here, using public information about the identities of 9000 editors and 43000 reviewers from the Frontie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2168-6408
DOI: 10.15453/2168-6408.1273